AI Version of Joaquin Oliver Speaks on Gun Violence in the US
florida, woensdag, 6 augustus 2025.
In an interview with journalist Jim Acosta, the AI version of Joaquin Oliver, who was killed seven years ago in a shooting in Florida, addresses the issue of gun violence in the United States. While the technology has garnered significant attention, it has also attracted considerable criticism. Joaquin’s parents hope that the AI will give their son a voice in the debate on stricter gun legislation, but experts warn of the ethical implications of ‘bringing back to life’ the deceased.
Technology and Impact
The AI version of Joaquin Oliver, who was killed on 14 February 2018 during a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, has been ‘brought to life’ using advanced AI technology. This technology, developed by a New York-based AI company, uses written material produced by Joaquin before his death to create a realistic avatar [1][2]. The aim of this AI version is to draw attention to the issue of gun violence in the United States and to give Joaquin a voice in the debate on stricter gun laws [1][2].
The Interview
In an interview with journalist Jim Acosta, which took place the day before today, the AI version of Joaquin spoke about the importance of gun use and safety in schools. ‘I was taken from this world too soon by gun violence in school. It is important to discuss these issues so that we can create a safer future for everyone,’ said Joaquin [1][2]. He emphasised the importance of a combination of stricter gun laws, mental health support, and community involvement to prevent gun violence [2].
Parents and Advocacy
Manuel and Patricia Oliver, Joaquin’s parents, created the AI version in collaboration with the Change the Ref Foundation, which they established to raise awareness about gun violence and school safety. Manuel Oliver stated that the AI would have a greater impact in advocating for stricter gun laws. ‘I understand that this is AI. I am not trying to bring my son back, because I cannot. But the technology is available, and we want to do something positive with it,’ he said [1][2].
Ethical Implications
While the technology has attracted much attention, it has also drawn significant criticism. Thomas Winters, a researcher in creative artificial intelligence at KU Leuven, notes that the technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated, particularly in text and voice cloning. On one hand, this can be beautiful; many mourners, for example, call the answering machine of someone who has passed away to hear their voice once more. On the other hand, we must consider whether we are delaying the grieving process and whether we are trying to build a society where we do not feel emotions [1][3]. Winters also warns of the danger of putting words in the mouth of someone who has died [1][3].
Reactions and Criticism
Acosta’s interview with the AI version of Joaquin Oliver has sparked numerous reactions on social media. Some people found it a powerful way to highlight the issue of gun violence, while others deemed it inappropriate and opportunistic. ‘Why give a computer a voice instead of real victims?’ was one critical response [1][4]. Manuel Oliver hopes that the AI version of Joaquin will gain more followers and participate in debates. ‘Joaquin has started uploading videos, and it is just the beginning,’ he said [2][4].